
The Ascent of Man as formerly shown...
Neanderthal Man, Cro-Magnon Man, Modern Man
I remember as a kid when we had some of those Time-Life books in the house, back around the 1970's or so. One of the ones I found particularly fascinating was the one titled
Early Man, which was focused on human origins. It featured a double-page chart with a fairly famous
picture sequence showing what the prevailing anthropological consensus at the time considered to be the most likely progression of the ascent of man, from a gibbon-like creature all the way up through various hominds such as
Australopithecus (
Africanus and
Robustus),
Homo Habilis,
Homo Erectus, Rhodesian Man, Neanderthal Man, Cro-Magnon Man, and finally, modern
Homo Sapiens Sapiens. I'm sure you've all seen it at one time or another. It has been copied and lampooned many times

There was a fairly detailed and lengthy section in the middle of the book dealing with Neanderthal Man, whose fossils were first discovered in Germany's Neander Valley 140 years ago, and who is thought to have arrived in Europe some 300,000 years ago before ultimately disappearing about 30,000 years ago. At the time, this information was presented as if human evolution occurred in a fairly straight line, with each species representing a link in the chain leading directly to the next. In other words, the stout, beetle-browed, short-limbed and supposedly unimaginitive Neanderthals were considered to be our direct ancestors.
That all seemed to change during the last couple of decades. Anthropologists and genetic scientists revised their estimation of Neanderthals and were claiming instead that the Neanderthals were an entirely separate hominid branch, a rival form of humans that co-existed with modern humans for a certain period of time and eventually became extinct. A dead end. Just one of several waves of hominds who came "out of Africa" before eventually being replaced by the last wave of modern humans.
This thinking stayed current until several weeks ago. In this 2007 video, it is hinted at darkly that the Neanderthal may have even been the victim of genocide at the hands of modern humans - that it is "almost certain that they were extinguished by our forebears."
9 comments:
Pretty chilling, if we did kill off the Neanderthals. If I'm remembering correctly, some of the earliest musical instruments are from them. (bone flutes and things.)
Jen,
Were the Neanderthals musical? That's pretty cool! I didn't know that. I've read that they'd figured out fire, wore skins, cared for their aged and buried their dead, but I didn't know that they'd figured out music. Diamond was saying in his book that even though they had stone tools, they showed no changes or advancement between 300,000 years ago and 30,000 years ago.
Interesting piece Jeff. I must admit that I am at the mercy of the scientist's integrity (read: "I don't know diddly about it")
If we can't agree on very recent history, like what actually happened last week, then we really have our work cut out for us figuring this one out!
Thanks for the post.
Hi Joe,
Ah, there's so much fracking stuff to know, y'know? The stuff I'm interested in knowing is rarely practical. :)
I read in one of the textbooks I was reading (too busy to look it up) that there has been a promotion of the racist idea that neanderthals were much more advanced than the Homo sapiens of the time, and that explains the difference between "advanced" Europe and "savage" Africa. So, yeah, people will use this the wrong way.
I love the Geico Caveman. The two greatest disappointments of the 21st century were the 2004 election and how bad the caveman TV show was.
Hi Liam,
I've read that the Neanderthals actually had larger brains than we do, so yeah, I think we're going to see some of that stuff if any of the loons out there are paying attention.
I never saw the caveman TV show, but I was surprised at how short a run it had. I always thought the commercials were pretty funny.
Hey,
Just thought i'd mention that despite the larger brain this doesn't mean neanderthals were more intelligent. I am studying psychology at the moment, and I think it is something to do with the amount of folds in the brain. Folds in the brain are a highly evolved trait (http://www.brainhealthandpuzzles.com/human_brain_folds.html).
It's highly unlikely we will find out enough information about neanderthal brains to assertain whether they were more intelligent or not which is a shame. It's really interesting.
Hi Hezzaj,
despite the larger brain this doesn't mean neanderthals were more intelligent.
True, and that's a good point to stress, especially if some people want to use that larger brain size to advance some sort of specious racial theories. Thanks.
Don't under estimate our ancestors, we learn every thing from them we could listen to our ape brothers and go back to the trees, save the planet at the same time, but no we want to destroy every thing, well dumb apes! Are intelligent despite brain size are older than us and don't harm the planet mmh!
Post a Comment